Blog

Defining culture isn’t just a “nice-to-have” for businesses - it’s the invisible hand that shapes every decision, relationship, and outcome, whether you’re a fast-moving start-up or a global corporate giant. Culture determines how your people behave under pressure, how innovation happens, and how your brand is experienced by clients and candidates alike. In my experience, the most resilient and successful organisations are those that invest early and intentionally in shaping their culture, rather than leaving it to chance. Why these four books? Because each provides a unique, practical lens for understanding and building culture. Mark Miller’s “Culture Rules” distils the essentials for leaders; Daniel Coyle’s “The Culture Code” reveals the science behind high-performing groups; Erin Meyer’s “The Culture Map” is indispensable for navigating cross-cultural dynamics; and John Childress’s “Culture Rules!” translates values into daily action. Taken together, they offer a comprehensive, actionable blueprint for any UK start-up or SME serious about using culture as a strategic advantage.

Let’s be honest. If traditional goal-setting worked, January wouldn’t feel like Groundhog Day every year. - You wouldn’t be recycling the same resolutions. - You wouldn’t be quietly abandoning them by mid-February. - You wouldn’t be wondering why motivation evaporates just when you “should” be at your most disciplined.

Across the UK, businesses of all sizes are feeling the squeeze. Wage inflation, skills shortages, and fierce competition for talent are forcing leaders to rethink how they set pay, structure benefits, and retain their best people, all while keeping an eye on financial stability. As we head into 2026, these pressures are only set to intensify.

“Change is inevitable. Preparation is a choice.” 2026 is set to be a transformative year for UK employment law, with a raft of new regulations and reforms that will reshape the HR landscape for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). As someone who has spent decades guiding businesses through regulatory shifts, I know that being proactive, not reactive, is the key to compliance and commercial advantage. This blog synthesises insights from leading sources including CIPD, Clyde & Co, Pinsent Masons, and more, to help SMEs understand what’s coming and how to prepare.

Why Your Training Fails Before It Begins Last week, an HR Director asked me: “Bob, we’ve tried everything—e-learning, workshops, external consultants—but nothing sticks. What are we doing wrong?” My answer surprised her: “You’re not doing anything wrong. You’re just doing the right things for the wrong outcomes.” This is the hidden crisis in corporate training. Research by Carter, Tracey, and Noe reveals that training effectiveness depends less on budget and more on matching method to desired outcome. Get this wrong, and even a £500,000 programme delivers negligible results. Get it right, and a £50,000 investment transforms performance.

The £2.5 Million Question Your organisation spends £250,000 annually on training. Twelve months later, what have you got to show for it? If you’re like most UK businesses, the honest answer is: “We’re not entirely sure.” Research reveals that only 10% of training transfers to measurable workplace behaviour change. That means £225,000 of your investment evaporates. Multiply this across a decade, and you’ve wasted £2.25 million on training that didn’t stick. As a Finance Director, you wouldn’t tolerate this waste in any other budget line. Why accept it in training?

The Training That Changed a £450k Bottom Line In 2002, Paul Taylor from DHL approached me with a challenge: transform his team into high performers whilst delivering improved productivity and reduced costs. We didn’t give them a lecture. We didn’t show them a PowerPoint. We immersed them in a business simulation - making cardboard dragsters under commercial pressure, redesigning processes, solving real-time problems, and experiencing the friction of cross-functional collaboration.

Why Generic Training Fails and Personalised Development Wins Two managers attend the same leadership training. Both rate it highly. Both leave with the same action plan. Six months later, one has transformed their team’s performance. The other has reverted to old habits. What’s the difference?

The Method That Captures 4-7x More ROI Your training programme just ended. Participants rated it 4.8 out of 5. The feedback forms are glowing. Leadership is delighted. Three months later, nothing has changed. Welcome to the satisfaction trap—where high ratings mask low transfer, and low transfer kills R.O.I. If you’re serious about capturing the 353% ROI that research proves training can deliver, it’s time to talk about delivery method. Because the gap between 10% transfer (lectures) and 70% transfer (simulations) is the difference between wasted budget and transformational impact.

A Conversation Every Finance Director Needs to Hear Picture this: Research shows training can deliver £4.53 for every £1 invested. That is a whopping 353% return. Your organisation spends £100,000 on leadership training. You should see £353,000 in measurable business value. If you invest £30,000 the return should be £105,900. The reality for most businesses with standard training delivery methods, even after twelve months later, they’ve captured perhaps 10% of that potential. If you were hoping for £353,000 you are probably missing £318,000 of your ROI. The money didn’t vanish. The potential was real. So what happened?